It's true that Orson Scott Card would only get a "few cents" of my movie ticket price, but even that is not okay.
In
just a couple of days from this writing, a movie that just about every
science fiction geek has sworn they would love to see made into a movie
will be coming to the big screen like a lifetime dream realized. Ender's Game,
by Orson Scott Card, has moral questions. It has plot twists. It has
intellectual quandaries. It has a fantasy fulfillment hero who most
geeks (with a propensity to be "gifted" themselves) tend to identify
highly with. It's got neat fights with smart combat. And by the end, it
has some serious fucking explosions! This book hits just about every
"must read" list of science fiction and mainstream alike.
Plus giant bugs. I mean come ON. It will be like Starship Troopers....except...you know....not stupid.
So
why on Earth wouldn't a geek like me be salivating to see it? Why is
it, that even though it's a winter release (facing down a lineup of
romantic comedies and Christmas feel good movies instead of summer
blockbusters in its own league), in what should rightly be the biggest
collective jeans creaming since The Avengers, there is instead a
trepidation on the part of many in the geek community about exactly how
much support to give this movie, if any? Why are so many simultaneously
wetting themselves to see this flick and struggling to justify doing so?
And why has there erupted a deluge of convoluted ways to rationalize a
viewing instead of the usual shameless pitching of tents at two in the
morning to wait in line, dressed like a Borg or Legolas or something?
You know...like normal.
Well,
unless you live in a cave or haven't been on the internet since before
the badger video went viral, you probably know that Orson Scott Card is a
flaming bag of unwiped anal sphincters. Actually, I should take that
back, because it's really insulting to all those anal sphincters out
there in that moment before they get wiped. This guy takes bigotry to a
level that is so breathtakingly offensive that any comparison to fecal
matter would actually be talking him up.
To understand my distaste, first I need to make a disclaimer.
Normally
I am the first guy in and the last one out when it comes to fighting
for the art/artist divide. Artists are people. And people have widely
divergent opinions on politics, religion, and in some cases morality.
And that's okay. I hate Tom Clancy's politics, but his books are like
popcorn, and I don't regret a dime I spend buying them just because he
and I disagree. He makes good art; it's worth money. End of story.
But
more than that even, people are just fucked up. They have foibles that
would shock you. They are morally weak sometimes. They have frailties.
Every single person has done something that is almost certainly worse
than the worst thing you can possibly imagine them doing. That's just
who we are.
In fact, that's a big part of what makes Ender's Game so interesting. - Ed |
So
if Michael Jackson wants to hang his baby off a balcony, I think that's
incredibly messed up, but it doesn't somehow make Thriller not a
incredible album. If Picasso wants to have affairs and tell his wife
about them in his art instead of actually telling her, that doesn't
make Les Demoiselles d’Avignon not one of the most incredible paintings
ever painted. It just means these humans are human, and because they're
so good at their art that they've become famous, someone was watching
when they were acting in a moment of human weakness.
If
Orson Scott Card were just "sort of" an asshole, quietly eating his
Chic-Fil-A sandwich and stating, when asked, that he preferred
traditional definitions of marriage and didn't think gays and lesbians
should be able to marry, I would be okay with that. Or if he had once
gone on a tirade after not getting sleep at a convention the night
before, and being accosted by his fifteenth Comic Book Guy clone during
his walk to the "Bugs In Literature" seminar that he got wrangled into
as a promotion by his agent, who he found out might be shtupping his
wife, I would hold my nose and enjoy the fucking shit out of this
movie.
But that's not what he did.
Not by a long shot.
First
of all, Card doesn't just hold a "disagreeable" position. He holds an
utterly reprehensible one. It is revolting. He didn't just say "I don't
think LGBT's should be allowed to get married" or "I think they're
wrong." He didn't say "not in my church" or "think of the children!"
It's not even a case of tacit approval or conspicuous silence. Card
openly....publicly...on the record....praised the government of Uganda
for how they are handling LGBT issues in that country.
And how exactly are they "handling" gays and lesbians in Uganda?
By killing them.
Yeah,
Uganda is the country that's been in the news for passing the "Kill the
Gays" bill. They put people in prison for life after multiple offenses.
Many gays are killed and the practice of "curative rape" on lesbians is
commonplace. It was only after international pressure that the death
penalty as a punishment for gay acts has been mostly reconsidered--not
that it doesn't go on plenty above the law. This is the same country
that Card got up and publicly praised for their solution.
Let that sink in for just a second.
"Remember kids, killing people is awesome!" -Ed |
Now
I could go all Godwin on you if I wanted to, but I trust your ability
to connect the dots to the fact that Card isn't just some right wing
guy I wish would stop shutting down my government and who has a
different take on school vouchers or abortion. Card has basically told a
country kicking off a genocide that they've got the right idea.
Card
also has actually used his leverage as a successful artist to support
these beyond-the-pale positions. While it is not unheard of for an
artist to use the attention they get to soapbox, they usually
compartmentalize their art and their cause. If someone turns a camera on
them, fine; they use the attention to champion their pet issue. But in
Card's case, no one particularly wanted to hear him outdo David Duke on
the Bigot-o-Meter. In fact, he's sort of a source of embarrassment to
most fans of Ender's Game and they really want him to stick to his work
and shut the fuck up about his raging homophobic bullshit. But Card
couldn't let well enough alone. He had to use the "cred" he got as an
artist to try to proliferate his disgusting position on his fellow human
beings forcing it out there by using his status as a well-known author
to muscle into mediums to spread his tripe.
So
no. I can't see this movie. I can't even handle the three cents that
would be going to Card to help him gear up for his next rant. I don't
want to know that I provided the pocket change that helped him buy a
soft taco that provided the calorie that he used to tell people that
someone who loves differently than he does ought to be killed for it. I
just can't. I thought about one of the half measures or alternative
methods, but eventually I arrived at the fact that if I can't give up a
movie--just one movie--how real is my support of an ideal?
The
geek community is nothing if not creative, and I've seen some pretty
interesting solutions to this from my fellow sci-fi nerds rationalizing
how to see this movie, even though Card makes them sick to their stomach.
Solutions from donating ten times the ticket cost to an LGBT charity to
paying for another movie and sneaking into Ender's game are only two
among dozens I've already heard of. (Though I suspect most will
probably just go, feel bad up until the first of The Games scenes
starts, and then not brag about having seen it at parties.) I commend
everyone who finds their own zen in this. I can't judge.
I
really do want to stress that part of it. My conclusions are mine. If I
talked you into denying Card YOUR three cents too, that's awesome, but I
do not think a boycott of this movie would be tactical or effective. I
simply cannot bear the thought of supporting that level of bigotry. It
would be, to me, like handing Pol Pot a nickle.
Now
I know that probably some day Ender's Game is going to be on in front
of me in a time and place that will have been genuinely (not
wink-wink-nudge-nudge) not of my engineering, and I'm not going to run
from the room screaming or anything. If the damage is done in terms of
Card getting his three cents to support his addiction to being a
shitheel, there's nothing to be done. At that point I expect to have
the typical geek reaction to movie adaptations of beloved source
material. The reaction not of if I will be disappointed, but rather how
disappointed I will be--gauged on scale from "Aww, Lord of the Rings
added a silly romance sub-plot!" to "What the fuck were they thinking
during the ENTIRE process of making Spider Man 3?" But until that
moment, I will NEVER see Ender's Game as long as Orson "The Uberbigot"
Scott Card is alive to benefit from it.
"Stop. Do not see my movie." - Ed |
[Chris Brecheen has his own blog at Writing About Writing and if you ever run out of Ace of Geeks articles to read, he wouldn't complain too much if you stopped by to check him out.]
I will never again read anything he has written.
ReplyDeleteHas Card ever addressed Uganda himself? Or do you mean that he is a member of N.O.M., an organization that went on missions to Uganda to spread anti-gay propaganda?
ReplyDeleteI absolutely do not dispute that Orson Scott Card has some absolute shit spewing out of his mouth, but I think a citation or link to a direct quote by him needs to be included in this article.
ReplyDeleteYou're right. Formatting was a pain since I had to send this article to the person who would actually be posting it. I didn't even TRY to do hyperlinks.
DeleteSalon has a pretty good article that catalogues his spectacularly bigoted words, including some recent fiction, his latest round of direct quotes, and his history with N.O.M.
He's not a "member" of N.O.M., he's on the board of directors. I do not know about direct quotes regarding Uganda, but there's a big difference between being a member and on the board of directors.
ReplyDeleteHe's a raging bigot, pure and simple. And I've seen enough articles and quotes from him over the years, that I'm glad I never read any of his works, and never will. And I won't be watching the movie, not even on TV/cable. I refuse to support in any way, shape, or form, such a person. And I've seen in several places that he's an EP on the film, meaning he will get income from its release, even if they aren't "royalties" like from a book.
ReplyDelete