A
little while back, Mike did a post
on whether there is such a thing as art being "bad".
This came right on the heels of me having seen a video called What
If Episode 2 Were Good (hold on, I'll link it
in a second, let me ramble a bit first), and boggling at how much
better this guy's
story was than what Lucas squeezed out. But Mike's post got me
thinking – under what circumstances might someone disagree?
Something
we frequently take for granted and rarely state outright when we
discuss whether something is "good" or "bad" is
what we want that thing to accomplish, i.e. what standard we're
judging it against. If I want a movie to move me on an emotional
level and tell me a good story, and you want to use the DVD as a
coaster, it might be great for you but terrible for me -- but without
understanding up front that we're looking for entirely different
things, any conversation we have on the topic is just going to have
us talking past each other.
"Jar Jar Binks at Naboo! Jar Jar Binks at Naboo!" |
So
on the topic of Star Wars in particular, I thought it would be
interesting to try to articulate what it was that I (and I suspect
many others) expect a "good" Star Wars prequel trilogy
might do. I'm going to try to restrain myself from pointing out
examples of failings in the actual prequel trilogy, because that'd
make a much longer post, and frankly, it's all
been
done.
1)
Maintain thematic and tonal consistency with the original trilogy.
You're
putting the name Star Wars on it, you're trying to sell it to people
who like Star Wars, you want to make it feel like Star Wars, right?
This means more than having some of the things look the same or have
the same names -- the original trilogy established how the world
works, how certain characters think and act, and there are certain
philosophical and moral themes running through it. Just as an
example, take Obi-wan and Yoda telling us (through Luke) about the
Force. We'd expect other movies in the series to preserve continuity
with what we learn about the Force, how it works, how a Jedi acts,
how a Sith acts, et cetera.
2)
Give satisfying answers to some of the questions we might have about
places and characters in the original trilogy.
This
is very open-ended, and a "good" prequel doesn't need to
show us the origin of each and every plot thread, but connecting at
least some of those dots is a good way to establish continuity
between the movies in a series. How did the Emperor rise to power?
What was Anakin like as a Jedi? More importantly, those questions
need to have interesting answers that form an engaging story in their
own right, or there's no point in making a prequel at all.
3)
Show us characters that we care about.
This
isn't so much a Star Wars requirement as a general storytelling
requirement, but in the particular context of these prequels, it's
especially important that we build (or at least maintain) a
connection with the characters that are significant to the larger arc
of the series. The big story of Anakin's corruption and redemption
is going to be much more engaging if we actually care about Anakin as
a character. The smaller story of Anakin and Obi-wan's friendship
before Anakin's fall won't connect with us if we can't connect with
those two characters. A love story subplot won't work if the
romantic interest is robotic and monotone. Et cetera.
These
requirements may seem like common sense to you or they may seem like
nitpicking, but keep them in mind as you watch What
If Star Wars Episode II Were Good?, and whether you think his
ideas are actually “good” in a universal sense, see if
you agree with me that as far as the above points go, his story does
a hell of a better job of covering them than the actual movie did.
And
now an open question for you, reader – what are you
going to be looking for in the upcoming trilogy? (And what do you
think are the odds of finding it?)
I think as far as making the prequels "feel" like Star Wars, I think Lucas did fine with that. The prequels take place at a different time, at the height of republic civilization, so the look and feel of the movies are a little brighter. The originals take place during the "dark times", giving the movies a darker feel. Since Lucas essentially made Anakin/Vader the central character of the entire saga, I think the movies also reflect what's going on with him. In Episode 1, he was still an innocent child, so the movie was more childlike. Episode 2 was a little more grown up, because Anakin was more grown up. Episode 3 was darker, because Anakin was darker. Return of the Jedi returned a little bit to that childlike innocence (the Ewoks) because Vader was about the redeem himself and gain back some of that lost innocence. At least that's the way I see it. I'm not sure what to expect with the sequels. I'm just going to wait and see what happens.
ReplyDelete